SMARTWATCH-BASED ACTIVITY TRACKING VERSUS STANDARD EXERCISE ADVICE IN GLYCEMIC CONTROL AMONG OVERWEIGHT ADULTS

Authors

Keywords:

Body Mass Index, Exercise Therapy, Glycemic Control, Overweight, Physical Activity, Smartwatch, , Type 2 Diabetes Prevention

Abstract

Background: Physical inactivity and sedentary behavior are major contributors to poor glycemic control and metabolic disorders in overweight adults. Conventional exercise counseling often fails to ensure sustained behavioral change due to lack of real-time feedback and self-monitoring. Wearable technology, particularly smartwatches, offers an innovative approach by promoting consistent activity tracking and motivation through instant feedback mechanisms.

Objective: To evaluate whether smartwatch-guided physical activity enhances glycemic control more effectively than conventional exercise advice among overweight adults.

Methods: A six-month randomized controlled trial was conducted in South Punjab involving 120 overweight adults aged 25–55 years. Participants were randomly allocated to a smartwatch-guided intervention group or a control group receiving standard exercise advice. The intervention group used smartwatches for daily activity tracking and goal setting. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and physical activity levels were measured at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests, paired t-tests, and repeated-measures ANOVA for normally distributed variables, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: The smartwatch group demonstrated significant improvements in glycemic parameters, with mean FBG decreasing from 116.4 ± 7.8 mg/dL to 101.3 ± 6.4 mg/dL and HbA1c from 6.2 ± 0.3% to 5.7 ± 0.3% (p < 0.001). The control group showed smaller changes (FBG: 115.9 ± 7.5 to 109.4 ± 6.8 mg/dL; HbA1c: 6.1 ± 0.4 to 5.9 ± 0.4%). BMI and waist circumference declined significantly only in the smartwatch group. Physical activity indicators, including step count and active minutes, were markedly higher among smartwatch users.

Conclusion: Smartwatch-based physical activity tracking produced superior improvements in glycemic control and activity adherence compared to standard exercise advice. The findings support the integration of wearable technology into community-level interventions for metabolic health improvement.

Author Biographies

  • Muhammad Imtiaz Subhani, A.O Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Center, Pakistan.

    Clinical Physiotherapist, A.O Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Center, Pakistan.

  • Muhammad Affan Nadeem, Ziauddin Hospital, Pakistan.

    Junior Cardio Physiologist, Ziauddin Hospital, Pakistan.

References

1. Kraushaar LE. Improving the efficiency of lifestyle change interventions for the prevention of cardiometabolic disease. 2010.

2. Reed W. Investigating the impact of Fitness Trackers on the outcomes of a weight management intervention delivered within a cardiovascular disease prevention context: University of West London; 2024.

3. Nieste I, Franssen WM, Spaas J, Bruckers L, Savelberg HH, Eijnde BOJPm. Lifestyle interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour in clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of different strategies and effects on cardiometabolic health. 2021;148:106593.

4. Western MJ, Standage M, Peacock OJ, Nightingale T, Thompson DJJFR. Supporting behavior change in sedentary adults via real-time multidimensional physical activity feedback: mixed methods randomized controlled trial. 2022;6(3):e26525.

5. Hernani MRA, Nepangue JU, Canillas JA, Elumbaring JB, Dagoc PP, Janito CR, et al. Examining the Efficacy of Pedometer Use in Enhancing Fitness Level: The Case of Tertiary Students in a State University. 2025;13(4):877-86.

6. Flack KD, Stults-Kolehmainen MA, Anderson III RE, Handlery R, Creasy SA, Catenacci VAJN. Exploring Strategies to Promote Exercise as a Viable Obesity and Chronic Disease Treatment. 2025;17(12):1997.

7. Pan Z, Li X, Yan Q, Zeng NJJoMIR. Application of Behavioral Science in Digital Therapeutics for Individuals With Prediabetes: Scoping Review. 2025;27:e78891.

8. Mazeas A. Development and evaluation of a digital intervention based on gamification to promote physical activity of patients with chronic diseases: Université Grenoble Alpes [2020-....]; 2023.

9. Säteri SJJD. The promotion of physical activity with remote technology with a special focus on cardiac rehabilitation. 2025.

10. Arshad MT, Ali M, Maqsood S, Ikram A, Ahmed F, Aljameel A, et al. Personalized Nutrition in the Era of Digital Health: A New Frontier for Managing Diabetes and Obesity. 2025;13(10):e71006.

11. Yu T, Parry M, Yu T, Xu L, Wu Y, Zeng T, et al. Effectiveness of Mobile Health–Based Gamification Interventions for Improving Physical Activity in Individuals With Cardiovascular Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. 2025;13:e64410.

12. Thielen SC, Reusch JE, Regensteiner JGJFiCD, Healthcare. A narrative review of exercise participation among adults with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes: barriers and solutions. 2023;4:1218692.

13. Arguello D, Rogers E, Denmark GH, Lena J, Goodro T, Anderson-Song Q, et al. Companion: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial to Test an Integrated Two-Way Communication and Near-Real-Time Sensing System for Detecting and Modifying Daily Inactivity among Adults> 60 Years—Design and Protocol. 2023;23(4):2221.

14. Flølo TN, Tørris C, Riiser K, Almendingen K, Chew HSJ, Fosså A, et al. Digital health interventions to treat overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: An umbrella review. 2025;26(6):e13905.

15. Hematabadi A, Rashidlamir A, Radfar B, Shourabi P, Hajimousaei S, Schauer M, et al. Social Media in Physical Activity Interventions Targeting Obesity Among Young Adults: Trends, Challenges, and Lessons from Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and Facebook. 2025;5(4):111.

16. Gkintoni E, Vantaraki F, Skoulidi C, Anastassopoulos P, Vantarakis AJBS. Promoting physical and mental health among children and adolescents via gamification—A conceptual systematic review. 2024;14(2):102.

17. 5. Facilitating positive health behaviors and well-being to improve health outcomes: standards of care in diabetes—2025 %J Diabetes care. 2025;48(Supplement_1):S86-S127.

18. Wu P-T, Baltich AA, Chu I-H, Chui KKJD. Wearable Activity Trackers to Improve Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Pilot Study. 2025;6(9):97.

19. Ahmad OM, Ibrahim R, Odunsi DI, Mohammed M, Mathew BG, Touny M, et al. Role of mobile health and wearable devices in cardiovascular disease prevention: a comprehensive review. 2025;17(5).

20. Diaz KM, Murdock ME, Clark AW, Kumar S, Jerez V, Serafini MA, et al. Breaking up prolonged sedentary behavior to improve cardiometabolic health (BREAK2): protocol for a dose-finding adaptive randomization trial. 2025;25(1):1929.

21. Daniel K, Daniel V, Solanki P, Solanki A. Regulatory Landscape and Quality Assurance in Nutraceutical Development. Nutraceuticals and Obesity: Routledge; 2025. p. 155-73.

22. Zhang G, Xia Y, Li X, Zhang Y, Xu X, Sun TJPp, et al. A Gamification mHealth Intervention to Enhance Adherence to Personalized Exercise for Older Adults with Chronic Diseases: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. 2025:3145-57.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

SMARTWATCH-BASED ACTIVITY TRACKING VERSUS STANDARD EXERCISE ADVICE IN GLYCEMIC CONTROL AMONG OVERWEIGHT ADULTS. (2025). Axis Journal of Scientific Innovations, 2(1), 30-39. https://jsi.axisacademics.com/index.php/public_html/article/view/10